Decision Center · Suite Index
Decision Center · Ranking LayerChoice Architect

Choice Architect

Treat your criteria as polytomous test items, your options as respondents. Recover a calibrated latent fit-to-need score for each option, with a 95% credible band — the same Rasch + Bayesian mathematics that powers the Emotion Tensor Forge, applied to choice.

1Frame
2Elicit
3Fit
4Rank
5Decide

Criteria

Weight: 1 = standard · >1 = critical · <1 = minor. Maps to IRT b-difficulty.

Options

Group lets you compare cohorts (e.g. "incumbent" vs "new"). Each option becomes an IRT respondent.

House note

The quick-rank below updates instantly as you score. Run IRT for calibrated θ, then Bayesian for credible bands — both compute on GCP Cloud Run.

emotionTensorIRT

Score matrix

Criterion🎯
Fit
💰
Cost
⚠️
Risk
⚡
Speed
↩️
Reversibility
🚀
Upside
Strategic alignmentw=1.5
Implementation costw=1
Time to valuew=1.2

0 = absent · 2 = neutral · 4 = strong. Each cell is one ordinal IRT response.

Ranked options

#1
Option A· incumbent0.00
#2
Option B· challenger0.00
#3
Option C· challenger0.00

Score combines axis polarity, criterion weight, and ordinal response. Run IRT for calibrated θ.

AI Disclosure: This platform uses generative AI. All outputs are AI-generated, may be inaccurate or incomplete, and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal, financial, tax, medical, psychological, engineering, or other professional advice, and no professional relationship is created by use of this service. Verify all outputs with a qualified professional before relying on them. Do not input regulated data (PHI, PII, MNPI, ITAR/EAR, CUI, privileged material) unless your organization has explicitly validated this surface for such use.
Virtual tokens • Educational purposes only
© 2026 Kineteq.ai